Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1102

reference
15-tree-1
name
1102
tree-preservation-order

undefined

15-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.010483 50.888313)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.010426 50.888307,-1.010429 50.888318,-1.010436 50.888328,-1.010449 50.888337,-1.010465 50.888342,-1.010482 50.888344,-1.010500 50.888342,-1.010516 50.888337,-1.010528 50.888329,-1.010537 50.888319,-1.010540 50.888308,-1.010537 50.888297,-1.010529 50.888287,-1.010517 50.888279,-1.010501 50.888274,-1.010484 50.888272,-1.010466 50.888273,-1.010450 50.888278,-1.010437 50.888286,-1.010429 50.888296,-1.010426 50.888307)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL